The risk of wildfire is higher in areas where trees and shrubs have replaced grasses, according to a new study.
Across the United States over the past decade, an average of over 61,000 wildfires have burned some 7.2 million acres per year.
Once a wildfire starts spreading, the firefighting task is exacerbated by issues like spot fires, where winds carry lofted sparks and start new fires outside of the original fire perimeter. The greater the potential spot fire distance, the more difficult wildfires are to monitor, control, and suppress.
The new study finds that as woody plants like shrubs and trees replace herbaceous plants like grasses, spot fires can occur farther away from the original fire perimeter. This “woody encroachment” is not only a major issue in grasslands where the study takes place, but also in wetland and savanna systems like longleaf pine, an important ecosystem in Florida.
“Spot fires are one of the most common reasons why houses burn in a wildfire,” says Victoria Donovan, an assistant professor with the School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences at the West Florida Research and Education Center at the University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (UF/IFAS).
“It’s not typically because the flames from wildfire reach a house, but that embers from that fire land on roofs, travel through home ventilation systems, or land on other combustible material on or near the home, and ignite the house from there. They’re a big concern for structural damage.”
The findings indicate that prescribed fire, which is commonly used in Florida to control woody plant growth, could help reduce spot fires.
The researchers looked at three phases of woody encroachment: the first a largely grassland area, the second grassland with new forested growth, and the third a dense forest.
They modeled the research using a mathematical fire simulation program and considered various conditions in Loess Canyons Experimental Landscape in south Nebraska. Donovan conducted this study as a researcher at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
“Our study shows that the risk of spot fire is much lower when you’re burning under the weather conditions used for prescribed fire, regardless of encroachment phase, compared to waiting for the potentially more extreme conditions we can see during wildfires,” Donovan says.
“This tells us that using prescribed fire early to control encroachment and reduce fuel load is a lot safer than waiting for a wildfire to occur.”
The safety concerns of woody encroachment extend beyond structures and residents to also include the firefighters battling the blaze.
“It is not only spot fire distance that increases wildfire risk from woody encroachment. Shrubs and trees can grow much taller than grasses,” Donovan says. “Think about putting out your campfire on the ground by pouring water on it, and compare that to trying to put out a fire a couple stories above you.”
The concerns are universal, she says, and reveal similarities no matter the land type where the wildfires occur.
“We’re seeing the same kind of issue here in Florida, where fire suppression has led to a lot of encroachment of shrubs,” Donovan says. “This creates these really dense forest stands rather than the open savannah systems that we would have seen historically with more frequent fire.”
Florida has become a model for prescribed burning across the country, though there is still hesitancy among some private landowners, she says. “Using prescribed fire as a controlling process for woody encroachment has far less risk than allowing woody encroachment and waiting for wildfire to occur.”
“Across the country, data has shown that fire is inevitable. Using prescribed fire allows us to decide what we want a lot of that fire to look like.”
The study appears in the journal PLOS ONE.
